Legal Opinion

Woodsum v. Pemberton Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 11, 1981PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

177 N.J. Super. 639 (1981)

427 A.2d 615

RICHARD WOODSUM AND JUDITH WOODSUM, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY ET. AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 10, 1981.

Decided March 11, 1981.

Before Judges FRITZ, POLOW and JOELSON.

Richard M. Sevrin argued the cause for appellants (Gertner, Gertner & Sevrin, attorneys).

Frederick W. Hardt argued the cause for respondents R. Louis Gallagher and Township of Pemberton (Sever & Hardt, attorneys for respondent R. Louis Gallagher; Polino &…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Washington Market Enterprises, Inc. v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. Costa v. JoseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Birchwood Lakes Colony Club, Inc. v. Borough of Medford LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Mayor and Council v. Klockner & KlocknerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  4. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Sims v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API