Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1917No. Civ. No. 2232PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. S. E. Crow, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The complaint stated a cause of action against defendant Davis and others to quiet the plaintiff’s title to land in Los Angeles County, described as lot 38 of the Monte Vista tract, containing twenty acres, as shown by a recorded map. The answer of defendant Davis denied plaintiff’s ownership of the west three acres of the north one-half of said lot, and alleged that said defendant is the owner of those three acres. By cross-complaint the same defendant alleged that he is the owner of said west three…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bank of Ukiah v. Petaluma Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Payne v. MoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reed v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Graves v. Arizona Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Brown v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Meagher v. Uintah Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API