Legal Opinion

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Runfola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs motion seeking summary judgment on an account stated for a credit card balance on the ground that plaintiff had made a previous motion for the same relief. While successive motions for summary judgment are generally discouraged (see, Welch Foods v Wilson, 277 AD2d 882; see also, Gadley v U.S. Sugar Co., 259 AD2d 1041), in this case defendant did not oppose the present motion on that ground. Indeed, neither party has addressed that ground on appeal.

We conclude that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Jim-Mar Corp. v. Aquatic Construction, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Welch Foods, Inc. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re CapocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. DenboerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2010
  2. Citibank (S.D.) N.A. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API