Legal Opinion

Shockett v. Akeson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

These two actions of tort, tried together, are brought by the administrator of the estate of James T. Shockett to recover damages for the latter’s death and conscious suffering resulting from the collision, at an intersection of public ways in the town of Framingham, of an automobile operated by the intestate and a truck owned by the defendant Akeson and operated by the defendant McDevitt, who at the time was acting within the scope of *290his employment. There were two trials. The judge at the first trial denied a motion in each case for a directed verdict, subject to the defendants’ exceptions,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kinnear v. General Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Brightman v. BlanchetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Avery v. R. E. Guerin Trucking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Mullett v. MilkeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  3. Hubbard v. ContiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Fallovallita v. JohnsynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Baxter v. BourgetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API