Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Conti

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 1947PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

These are two actions of tort, brought by the administratrix of the estate of Harry A. Hubbard, to recover for his death as the result of a collision in Brimfield on May 14, 1941, between one and two o’clock in the morning, of an automobile owned and operated by him with a tractor-trailer, nearly fifty feet long and weighing ten tons, owned by the defendant Boston & Buffalo Transportation Company and operated by its servant the defendant Conti. In each action there was also a count for damage to the automobile. There was a verdict for the plaintiff upon each count in each case. The cases come…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Newcomb v. Boston Protective DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Commonwealth v. OsmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Macchiaroli v. HowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SilversteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Arrigo v. LindquistMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. FleenorMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  4. O'CONNELL v. Esso Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Barow v. ModoonoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API