State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Giessmann
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
¶ 1 The Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association/General Counsel), has charged the Respondent, William Giess-mann, with a violation of Rule 1.31 and Rule 1.42 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for failure to diligently represent and communicate with a client.3 The parties submitted Stipulations of Fact and Conclusions of Law with Agreed Recommendations for Discipline. The Professional Responsibility Tribunal (PRT) adopted the stipulations of fact and conclusions of law as part of its findings. A review of the record reveals the stipulated facts and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BesleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. HulettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.