Legal Opinion
Rashidi v. Albright
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1994No. 93-15623UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
39 F.3d 1188
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Manouchehr RASHIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harold G. ALBRIGHT, D. Roe and C. Roe, Natural Parents of
Tim Roe, a minor child, and Nancy L. Parent, as
Guardian Ad Litem for Tim Roe, Defendants.
No. 93-15623.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 6, 1994.*
Decided Oct. 31, 1994.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grochocinski v. Rieger ex rel. Galena Family Trust (In re KJK Construction Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- In Re Kjk Const. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009