Legal Opinion

Bistermu Mora Salgado v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2018No. 14-71890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BISTERMU S. MORA SALGADO, No. 14-71890 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A092-406-486 JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 8, 2018 * Pasadena, California Filed May 8, 2018 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, ** District Judge. Opinion by Judge Gould * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jose Cruz Romero-Torres v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Laeila Nelson, Stephanie Nelson, Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. M-A-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
  4. Howard Nee Hao Wong v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Edwin Campos Mejia v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rene Lemus-Escobar v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. Antonio Gomez-Beltran v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Celedonio Silva-Olayo v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Daniel Fernandez-Manzano v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Francisco Salinas-Medina v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API