Legal Opinion

John Gallo v. Moen Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2016No. 14-3633, 14-3918PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J., joined by Boggs, J.,

STRANCH, J. (pp. 274-82), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

At issue is whether several collective bargaining agreements entitle a class of retirees from Moen Inc. to vested healthcare benefits for life. The district court granted relief to the class based on UAW v. Yard-Man, Inc., 716 F.2d 1476 (6th Cir.1983), and other Sixth Circuit decisions applying Yard-Man. In M & G Polymers USA LLC v. Tackett, — U.S.—, 135 S.Ct. 926, 190 L.Ed.2d 809 (2015), decided after the district court’s decision in this ease, the Court repudiated the Yardr-Man line of cases.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. CNH Industrial N. v. v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Rita Kendzierski v. County of MacOmbMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Franklin Am. Mortg. Co. v. Univ. Nat'l Bank of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. Wilmington Trust Co. v. AEP Generating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API