Legal Opinion

Michael Maslak v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 6, 2016No. 4D14-4672, 4D14-4673 and 4D14-4707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION

MAY, J.

The borrower appeals three final judgments of foreclosure. He argues the trial court erred in entering the judgments because the witness for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee of. WAMU Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-PR4 (“Wells- Fargo”) was unqualified to testify to the payment history. Wé agree and reverse.

The borrower executed three promissory notes and mortgages to Washington Mutual Bank (‘WAMU”). . JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (“Chase”) was the-servi-cer of the loans. WAMU endorsed the notes to Wells Fargo, which became the trustee of the WAMU…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cayea v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Natacha Peuguero and Angelo Peuguero v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Sas v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Landmark American Insurance Company v. Pin-Pon Corporation and Lexington Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Channell v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Household Fin. Corp. IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. RosemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Cynthia L. Jackson v. Household Finance Corporation IIISupreme Court of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API