Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Household Fin. Corp. III
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 31, 2018No. Case No. 2D15–2038PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Cynthia and Thomas Jackson seek review of a final judgment of mortgage foreclosure which was entered after a bench trial. We affirm but write to explain our conclusion that the testimony at trial provided a proper foundation for the admission of business records into evidence. In so doing, we certify conflict with the Fourth District's decision in *1172Maslak v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 190 So.3d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).
Under Florida's evidence code, "[r]ecords of regularly conducted business activity" are admissible as an exception to the rule barring the admission of hearsay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yisrael v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Nordyne v. Florida Mobile Home SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Love v. GarciaSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Natacha Peuguero and Angelo Peuguero v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Channell v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cynthia L. Jackson v. Household Finance Corporation IIISupreme Court of Florida · 2020
- Frank Cayard v. US Bank National Association and Melrose Homes at Monarch Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Mark H. Schofield v. Monroe County, FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Ross Dubins, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- VEDRICK LAMONTE SYMONETTE v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021