Legal Opinion

Sas v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 17, 2013No. 2D11-6327PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

Andre Sas appeals the trial court’s final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). Although Sas raises several challenges to the final judgment, we find merit in only one of his arguments. Sas argues that Fannie Mae representative Jon Greenlee’s oral testimony about the amount of the debt owed by Sas to Fannie Mae was hearsay and, therefore, legally insufficient to establish the amount of the debt because Fannie Mae never admitted into evidence any business records supporting Greenlee’s testimony. We agree with this argument.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mazine v. M & I BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Sottilaro v. FigueroaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Cullimore v. Barnett Bank of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wolkoff v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Kristy S. Holt v. Calchas, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Natacha Peuguero and Angelo Peuguero v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Brian M. Beauchamp v. The Bank of New York Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Boyette v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API