McDowell v. Citicorp U.S.A.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Pamela McDowell suffered a work-related injury while employed at Citibank of South Dakota. She was paid workers’ compensation benefits and eventually entered into a settlement agreement. The agreement required Citibank’s insurer to pay all future necessary and reasonable medical expenses causally related to her injury. McDowell later brought suit against Citibank and other defendants alleging that they acted in bad faith by unreasonably delaying payment of her medical bills. Defendants moved for summary judgment. After two hearings, the circuit court granted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- United States v. Elie F. Abboud (04-3942) and Michel Abboud (04-3943)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Moody v. St. Charles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Hammonds v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Delka v. Continental Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- McDowell v. CITICORP INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.