Legal Opinion

Acme-Goodrich, Inc. v. NEAL, ETC.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1959No. 19,035Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

Myers, J.

Appellant, Acme-Goodrich, Inc., has filed a petition for rehearing in which it has set forth three grounds upon which it claims the court’s decision is erroneous.

First, it claims that the opinion states that a complaint to set aside a judgment must contain within the body of the complaint a- complete transcript of pleadings and judgment, which contravenes ruling precedents of the Supreme Court. The opinion follows most of the authorities cited by appellant and very clearly states that it is not necessary to set forth the pleadings, proceedings or entries in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Houk v. BartholdIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Cain v. GodaIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State Ex Rel. Beckham, Sr. v. Vanderburgh Cir. Ct.Indiana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Jamison v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API