Legal Opinion

Hill v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1917No. 23,296PublishedCited by 6 opinions

• From Lake Superior Court; Charles E. Greenwald, Judge. Action by Clinton C. Hill against Harry E. Taylor and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for appellees in an action instituted by appellant for the partition of certain real estate in Lake county. The property in question was owned by Anna E. Hill, wife of appellant, at the time of her death and then passed as a common estate to appellant, as her surviving widower, and appellee Harry Taylor, her son by a former marriage, unless, as is contended by appellees, the question of descent is affected in this case by the provisions óf §3036 Burns 1914, §2498 R. S. 1881. That statute provides that “if a husband shall abandon his wife without just cause,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hahn v. BealorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Carr v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Hall v. Terre Haute Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Repp v. Indianapolis, Columbus & Southern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Farmers State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Hinds, TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Struble-Werneke Motor Co. v. Metropolitan Securities Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Weber v. FohlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Morehouse v. KobleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API