Schlobohm v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, Chief Judge.
The above entitled cause .heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:
*594Judgment will be for the defendant, that the plaintiff take nothing by his complaint. Costs to the defendant.
Findings and judgment to be prepared by Counsel for the defendant under local rule 7.
Comment
The plaintiff seeks to recover income tax payments allegedly overpaid for the taxable years 1945 and 1946. Timely application for refund has been made.
The whole question involved is whether the Commissioner was right in disregarding the partnership existing between the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tinkoff v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Harkness v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Toor v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Parker v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956