Legal Opinion

Schlobohm v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 23, 1952No. 13687-YPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, Chief Judge.

The above entitled cause .heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:

*594Judgment will be for the defendant, that the plaintiff take nothing by his complaint. Costs to the defendant.

Findings and judgment to be prepared by Counsel for the defendant under local rule 7.

Comment

The plaintiff seeks to recover income tax payments allegedly overpaid for the taxable years 1945 and 1946. Timely application for refund has been made.

The whole question involved is whether the Commissioner was right in disregarding the partnership existing between the plaintiff and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Tinkoff v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  4. Harkness v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Toor v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  2. Parker v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API