Christiansen v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This action was instituted to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The jury returned a verdict for a large sum in favor of appellant, upon which respondents moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative for a new trial, based upon all the statutory grounds. After considering the matter, the trial court granted the motion for judgment n. o. v. and also the alternative motion for a new trial, in case the judgment should be reversed on appeal.
Respondents open their brief with a motion to strike the statement of facts, upon the ground that it was not served or filed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simmons v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Eberhart v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hightower v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Ton v. StetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Saunders v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peasley v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Hayes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Uhr v. EatonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- Brooks v. BoldeWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.