Legal Opinion

Borum v. Fouts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1860PublishedCited by 31 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellant, who was the plaintiff, brought this action against the appellees, to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate in Tippecanoe county. The following is the case made by the complaint. The plaintiff, on September 11, 1854, sold the land described in the mortgage to the defendant, Jacob Fonts, who, at that date, executed to him six promissory notes: the first for $1,060, due December 25,1855; the second for $1,120, due December 25, 1856; the third for $1,180, due December 25, 1857; the fourth for $1,200, due December 25, 1858; the fifth for $1,500, due December 25, 1859; and, the sixth…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright v. BundyIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Jenkinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Stephens v. MuirIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  4. State Bank v. CoquillardIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Crawford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hanlon v. DohertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Graham v. CourtrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API