Legal Opinion
Stanger v. Ambach
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 1980No. 79 Civ. 0859 (CLB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Defendant and third-party plaintiff Behavior Research Institute, Inc. (“BRI”) has presented a motion, which has been joined in by the plaintiffs, for a preliminary injunction (1) enjoining defendant Gordon Ambach, Commissioner of the State Education Department, and the third-party defendant Howard F. Miller, Director of the Budget of the State of New York, from using the “Standards for Activities Reimbursable for State Aid Purposes” (the “Standards”) in the setting of tuition and maintenance rates for BRI, (2) enjoining third-party defendant Miller…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Concerned Parents & Citizens For The Continuing Education At Malcolm X (Ps 79) v. The New York City Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Dubendorf v. New York State Education DepartmentNew York Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parks v. PavkovicDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Vander Malle v. AmbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Brooks v. PatakiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Jean Fallis v. Gordon M. AmbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. PatakiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.