Legal Opinion
Vander Malle v. Ambach
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1987No. 81 Civ. 1365(RJW)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Harold and Phyllis Vander Malle, both individually and as the parents of Bruce Vander Malle, instituted this action against various education officials of the State of New York and the City of New York seeking damages and reimbursement for expenses incurred as a result of defendants’ alleged violation of their affirmative statutory and constitutional obligation to provide their son Bruce a free appropriate public education. 1 Both parties have renewed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons to follow, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motion in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hope v. CortinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Mrs. B. ex rel. M.M. v. Milford Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Burke County Board of Education v. Denton ex rel. DentonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. Hoerner (In Re Grand Valley Sport & Marine, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
- Ash v. Lake Oswego School District No. 7JDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.