Casco Mercantile & Trust Co. v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.

The plaintiff in error was nonsuited in an action against the defendants in error for the conversion of certain cattle and brings the case here for review.

*480The complaint contained a much more detailed statement of the facts than was necessary, but it was good under Littell v. Brayton Co., 70 Colo. 286, 201 Pac. 34. It follows from the decision in *Baker v. Cordwell, 6 Colo. 199, that all that is necessary under the code is to allege that defendant took certain goods of the plaintiff (describing them) and converted them to his own use, which would be equivalent to trespass de bonis at common…