Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Zang

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 1, 1926No. 11,199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES was nonsuited in the district court in an action brought by him against Zang and the Western Appraisal Company and brings error.

The complaint is full of evidential matter in violation of many decisions of this court, and prolix to an extreme degree, in violation of the Code, but from it may be gathered two claims, viz: (1) That defendant converted to his own use certain stock of the plaintiff in the Western Appraisal Company, and (2) that he conspired with said company, and acted with it to obtain possession of said stock and so dispose of it as to deprive plaintiff thereof. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  2. Goldstein v. Rocky Mountain Envelope Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Casco Mercantile & Trust Co. v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. SeloomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Thomas v. SeloomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API