Legal Opinion
Nardei v. Maughan (In Re Maughan)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 12, 2001No. 01-8008PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AUG, Bankruptcy Judge.
Appellant, Edwin W. Maughan (“Debt- or” or “Maughan”), appeals the judgment of the bankruptcy court holding that the debt owed by him to the appellee, John P. Nardei (“Nardei”), is nondischargeable. Maughan contends that the bankruptcy court erred in granting Nardei an extension of time in which to file a nondis-chargeability complaint. Nardei’s motion requesting an extension of time was filed three days after the deadline for the filing of complaints objecting to dischargeability of debts or discharge of the Debtor. We REVERSE.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES
The sole 1 issue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,430 in Re William J. McLaren Debtor. William Longo, Sr. v. William J. McLarenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,948 in Re Kenneth L. Isaacman, Debtor. J.E. Nicholson, Jr. v. Kenneth L. IsaacmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Schunck v. Santos (In Re Santos)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Dolores Benedict, A/K/A Dolores Cogliano, Debtor. European American Bank v. Dolores Benedict, A/K/A Dolores CoglianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ohio Farmers Insurance v. Leet (In Re Leet)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- In Re RowlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Hanjora v. Hanjora (In Re Hanjora)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001