Legal Opinion
In Re Rowland
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 2002No. 15-11166PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Bankruptcy Judge.
Introduction
First Republic Bank (“First Republic” or “the Bank”) has filed a Motion entitled, Motion to Extend the time to File a Complaint to Determine the Non-Discharge-ability of the 5510 Concord Pike Indebtedness, Nunc Pro Tunc (Motion). The Debtor has filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses (Answer) which opposes the Motion. A hearing on the Motion was held on February 20, 2002. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied.
Background
Because no testimony was offered at the hearing, the factual record consists only of those…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DeAngelis v. Rychalsky (In Re Rychalsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- In Re FellheimerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Schwartz v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- In Re Boltz-RubinsteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re PhillipsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.