Legal Opinion

Pierson v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1968No. Civ. 31146PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.

Appellant, the beneficiary of a policy issued by respondent company (herein severally referred to as respondent) insuring the life of her husband, seeks declaratory relief against respondent and one Gormley to establish her right to the proceeds of the policy. Respondent asserted the policy had lapsed prior to the date of death due to nonpayment of premium. Appellant appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent and Gormley.

Appellant's husband had been insured with respondent prior to application for and issuance of the policy before us.

The facts hereafter outlined are uncontradicted.

Glenn…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. Home Benefit Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Page v. Washington Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Steil v. Sun Insurance OfficeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. MarkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Peterson v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tate v. Charles Aguillard Ins. & Real Est.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Johnston Equipment Corp. of Iowa v. Industrial IndemnitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Foster v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. DuBeck v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Ryman v. American National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API