Legal Opinion

Johnston Equipment Corp. of Iowa v. Industrial Indemnity

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 22, 1992No. 91-742PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Many insurance lawsuits involve claims of coverage, notwithstanding a missing provision in the policy. This dispute is the converse of the usual claim. Here the company contends that, because' the parties so agreed, there should be no coverage for a products liability claim. We agree that there should be no coverage, even though no clear policy provision excluded it, and even though, through mistake, an endorsement excluding coverage was omitted from the policy.

On our de novo review of this equitable action, we find the following. Charles Cor-rill, a worker at a Denison, Iowa,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Miller v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Intel Corp. v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1988
  4. Cal-Farm Insurance v. TAC Exterminators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PflibsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Gibson v. ITT Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. State of Iowa v. Marc A. HagenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Voss v. State, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API