Legal Opinion

Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 19, 2006No. 05-5052PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

A development and construction contract required the government to reimburse the contractor for 80 percent of its cost of performing the contract. The contract’s termination-for-the-convenience-of-the-government clause (“termination clause”) required the government upon such termination to pay the contractor “[a]ll costs reimbursable” under the contract. See 48 C.F.R. § 52.249-6(g); Jacobs Eng’g Group, Inc. v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 451, 455 (2005) (trial court decision). The question is whether, when the government so terminated the contract, it was required…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Red River Holdings, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Tektel, Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. 2Connect W.L.L.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2017
  5. Aclr, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API