Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
A development and construction contract required the government to reimburse the contractor for 80 percent of its cost of performing the contract. The contract’s termination-for-the-convenience-of-the-government clause (“termination clause”) required the government upon such termination to pay the contractor “[a]ll costs reimbursable” under the contract. See 48 C.F.R. § 52.249-6(g); Jacobs Eng’g Group, Inc. v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 451, 455 (2005) (trial court decision). The question is whether, when the government so terminated the contract, it was required…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Red River Holdings, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Tektel, Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- 2Connect W.L.L.Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals · 2017
- Aclr, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.