Legal Opinion

Tokio Marine Speciality Insurance Co. v. Thompson Brooks, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 26, 2017No. Case No. 17-cv-00514-WHOPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STAYING THE CASE .

Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 32

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Tokio Marine Specialty Insurance Company (“Tokio”) moves for summary judgment claiming it owes no duty to defend or indemnify defendant Thompson Brooks, Inc. (“TBI”) in two underlying lawsuits pending in state court.’Tokio contends the claims áre excluded from coverage under the policy, thereby excusing Tokio from its duty to defend. I conclude that Tokio continues to 'have a duty to. defend TBI since-there are factual questions regarding…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Letgolts v. David H. Pierce & Assoc.California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API