Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Cartier

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1906No. 1,268PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is an action brought by defendants in error to recover damages on a bond given to obtain a temporary restraining order. The original action was in ejectment to recover possession of a fractional mining claim described as the “Little Chance Fraction.” At the time the original action was commenced an order to show cause was made, directing the said defendants in error to appear before the court on August 29, 1903, to show cause why an injunction should not issue pendente lite, enjoining said defendants in error from mining upon or extracting any gold from said claim,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lindeberg v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  2. Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  3. Heiser v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Donnelly Garment Co. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API