Legal Opinion
State v. Pittman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 2021No. S067312PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
498 Argued and submitted September 15, 2020; decision of Court of Appeals reversed, judgment of circuit court reversed, and case remanded to that court for further proceedings January 28, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. CATRICE PITTMAN, Petitioner on Review. (CC 16CN03799) (CA A162950) (SC S067312)
479 P3d 1028
In connection with a criminal prosecution for drug-related crimes, the state moved for a court order compelling defendant to unlock the phone that was found in defendant’s purse. The state sought the order so that it could search the phone, pursuant to a valid search…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RamozOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. A. R. H.Oregon Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- United States v. Jeremy PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- State v. ShevyakovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.