Legal Opinion

Hammer v. City of Philadelphia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1931No. Appeal 262PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

In October, 1928, the City of Philadelphia was constructing a subway under a portion of South Broad Street and in connection therewith- laid down temporary sidewalks, constructed of two-inch planks. At a point on the east sidewalk about four feet from the curb and opposite the south building line of Chestnut Street there was a manhole, approximately three feet in diameter, leading into a conduit of a public utility and covered with an iron disc, securely fastened. A circular hole, corresponding in size with the disc, was cut out of the planking in order to afford…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Canavan v. City of Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Corporation of Borough v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Becker v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Reed v. BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Ponti v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Allen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Blake v. FriedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API