Legal Opinion

Blake v. Fried

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1953No. Appeals, 190 and 191PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

This is an action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiffs while they were spectators at stock car races conducted at defendants’ stadium. After a jury verdict for each plaintiff, the defendants moved for judgment n.o.v., and after their motion was overruled and judgments entered on the verdicts, they appealed to this Court.

There is no dispute as to the facts. On the evening of September 4, 1950, plaintiffs paid admission to and occupied seats in defendants’ stadium for the purpose of watching stock car races. Stock cars are ordinary…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Titus v. Bradford etc. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, McKean County1890
  5. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Leatherwood v. WadleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Gibson Ex Rel. Gibson v. Shelby County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. Shula v. WarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API