Legal Opinion

United States v. Lutz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1980No. Nos. 78-2969, 78-2978, 78-2970 and 78-3008PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Lutz, Stewart, White, and Zitek appeal their convictions for mail fraud and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, and 2. We affirm.

I

In October 1975, Stewart and Lutz organized Nation-Wide Funding, Inc. (NationWide), a loan-brokerage firm whose advertised goal was to find financial backing for high-risk borrowers. The evidence at trial established' that Nation-Wide personnel obtained thousands of dollars in advance fees from prospective borrowers by promising instant or virtually guaranteed funding for the borrowers’ projects, even though the Nation-Wide…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. BliesnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. State v. DictadoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. David Dene Martin v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Sonja HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API