Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1976No. 75-1441PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

The Union Pacific Railroad Company appeals a judgment of the district court, following a decision that a contract between the Union Pacific and the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (the Milwaukee) terminated when the connecting tracks were removed. We affirm.

In 1910, the predecessor to the Union Pacific (the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company) entered into three trackage agreements with the predecessor to the Milwaukee (the Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Company).1 These contracts provided for the construction and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sacramento Navigation Co. v. SalzSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Ronald G. Forsyth v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Card v. StirnweisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Frenchman & Sweet, Inc. v. Philco Discount Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API