Frenchman & Sweet, Inc. v. Philco Discount Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
This breach of contract action arises out of termination of a supermarket merchandising plan because of the withdrawal from its operation of a third party, whose participation was essential to the continuance of the plan. The respondent, an appliance dealer, agreed to participate with appellant, a financing subsidiary of Phileo Corporation, in the sale of Phileo products in supermarkets. The issues are: (1) whether appellant had any obligation to make available the place of performance for a minimum of seven months provided for in the contract and (2) if there was such a duty, whether…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Haughey v. Belmont Quadrangle Drilling Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Burr v. American Spiral Spring Butt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lowenschuss v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Estate of Frances Hatch v. NYCO Minerals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Giblin v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Lowenschuss v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- M & M Transportation Co. v. Schuster Express, Inc. (In Re M & M Transportation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.