Legal Opinion

Frenchman & Sweet, Inc. v. Philco Discount Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 1964PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This breach of contract action arises out of termination of a supermarket merchandising plan because of the withdrawal from its operation of a third party, whose participation was essential to the continuance of the plan. The respondent, an appliance dealer, agreed to participate with appellant, a financing subsidiary of Phileo Corporation, in the sale of Phileo products in supermarkets. The issues are: (1) whether appellant had any obligation to make available the place of performance for a minimum of seven months provided for in the contract and (2) if there was such a duty, whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Haughey v. Belmont Quadrangle Drilling Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Burr v. American Spiral Spring Butt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Lowenschuss v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Estate of Frances Hatch v. NYCO Minerals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Giblin v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Lowenschuss v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. M & M Transportation Co. v. Schuster Express, Inc. (In Re M & M Transportation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API