Legal Opinion
Essex Insurance v. Yi
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 30, 1992No. C-91-4030 FMSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FERN M. SMITH, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action arises from a dispute between Essex Insurance Company (“Essex”) and its insureds, Frank Yi and Sandra Chu Yi, and Ryan J. De Jesus, a claimant against the Yis. Essex seeks a declaratory judgment that it has no obligation to defend and/or indemnify the Yis in De Jesus’s pending state court action against the Yis for personal injury, general negligence and intentional tort. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1332.
Essex moves for summary judgment seeking a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ralph R. Riehl, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Century Transit Systems, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Essex Insurance Co. v. Fieldhouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Hermitage Insurance v. DahmsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Maloney v. Scottsdale InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.