Legal Opinion

Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 12, 1997No. CA A89428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*39LANDAU, J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) requiring, as a condition of post-prison supervision, that he not enter most of Lane County. He contends that such an extraordinary condition is broader than necessary. The Board contends that it is permitted to impose “whatever special conditions it deems necessary” and, as long as the determination is not inconsistent with an agency rule, stated agency position or practice in some unexplained fashion or otherwise in violation of a constitutional or statutory provision, it is for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Owens v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Dingman v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brunick v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rund v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Jenkins v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API