Legal Opinion

Rund v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 1998No. CA A94159 (Control) and CA A90986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of orders of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that conditioned his post-prison supervision (PPS) on his enrollment in a sexual offender treatment program and, after petitioner had violated that condition, that imposed a local sanction of 90 days’ incarceration for the violation. We review for errors of law and affirm.

Petitioner was convicted of second-degree kidnapping and sentenced to 55 months in prison plus three years PPS. Before imposing that sentence, the court had received a presentence report about petitioner. The information in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Thompson v. PrinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API