Legal Opinion

Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co. v. Combs

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1925No. 567-4026PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.

Plaintiff in error, railroad company, while engaged in interstate carriage of freight, had in its employ in the carriage of such freight defendant in error, Combs, who was acting in the capacity of freight conductor. While the engine and a string of freight cars was being backed, to a freight car that was standing, for the purpose of making a coupling, Combs, just before the moving car reached the standing ear, placed his foot on the drawhead of the moving car for the purpose of placing the couplers in line to make the coupling with the standing car. The cars failed to couple and in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ShiederTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stiles v. HawkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Olds Motor Works v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. El Paso Electric Railway Co. v. HarryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Freeman v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Armour & Co. v. TomlinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. SchmidtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  5. McDonald v. SimonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API