Armour & Co. v. Tomlin
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRITZ, Judge.
This suit was prosecuted in the district court of Dallas county, Tex., by Mrs. Myrtle Tomlin, a widow, whom we shall hereafter designate as plaintiff, against Armour & Co., a corporation, and Cecil Wise, whom we shall hereafter designate as defendants. The plaintiff’s alleged cause of action was for damages for personal injuries, and injuries to her automobile, resulting from a collision of a truck belonging to Armour & Co. and driven by Wise, with the automobile of plaintiff while she was driving same on a public street in the city of Dallas. The case was submitted to a jury in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Graves v. HaynesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Olds Motor Works v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Armour & Co. v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Freybe v. TiernanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. EctorTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. NoackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. SchmidtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.