Legal Opinion

Geller v. Dallas Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1922No. 8942. [fn*]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSergeant, C. J.

On January 8, 1917, the city of Dallas, acting through its governing authorities, the mayor and board of commissioners, granted to C. W. Hobson, his associates and assigns, a franchise containing the right to use the streets of said city for the purpose of maintaining an electric street railway system. The franchise ordinance provided that it would take effect when submitted to and approved by a majority of the qualified voters of the city of Dallas. Pursuant thereto, the ordinance was submitted and approved and then accepted in writing by the grantee. Later, appellee, by purchase from Hobson…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Westhues v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Barbour v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. In Re Estate of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Texarkana v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Sanborn v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. McCall v. State Ex Rel. DanielsSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. Hudson v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Artcarved Class Rings, Inc. v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API