Legal Opinion
Neis v. Fresenius USA, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 28, 2002No. 01-70503PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and Defendant’s .motion to strike declaration. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED and Defendant’s motion to strike declaration is DENIED.
I. Facts
The present case involves allegations of sex discrimination. Defendant Fresenius USA, Inc. (“Defendant”) is a national provider of products and services to individuals with chronic kidney failure.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, Inc. v. AshbrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004