Legal Opinion

Widing v. Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1998No. A9206-03651; CA A81704PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action, asserting claims, inter alia, for negligent misrepresentation and fraud against defendant Welch (Welch), the copersonal representative of their deceased father’s estate, and for professional negligence against defendant Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt (Schwabe), the estate’s attorneys. The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment on the ground that the various claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiffs appeal, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred because the running of the limitation period was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Woolston v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mathies v. HoeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Widing v. ESTATE OF WIDINGCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Spirit Partners, LP v. Stoel Rives LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Curzi v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Gessele v. Jack in the Box, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  5. McLean v. Charles Ellis Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API