Legal Opinion
Colclasure v. Colclasure
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 2012No. 109,218PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.:
T1 The only issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in its valuation of the marital business. We reverse and remand to the trial court for a valuation of the parties' marital business which includes *1126any loss in its value due to husband's competing business. Such a determination must include its value as of the date that the husband purchased a share of the business, as well as any offset to the valuation of husband's share of the business because he received money from the business during the pendency of the divorce.
FACTS
€2 The appellant, Lori Colclasure Dean…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Thielenhaus v. ThielenhausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Larman v. LarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- CHILDERS v. CHILDERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- HAMM v. HAMMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.