Legal Opinion

State v. Pruitt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1989No. 8818SC934PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant has grouped his numerous assignments of error into six basic arguments. First, defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing the State’s witnesses to attest to defend ant’s past sexual conduct. Second, defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting testimony of one witness to corroborate another witness’s testimony about defendant’s past sexual conduct. Third, the defendant urges this Court to find error in the trial judge’s jury instruction on possession of a deadly weapon. Fourth, the defendant asserts that the court committed plain error in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. SneedenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API