Legal Opinion

State v. Sneeden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1993No. 9111SC820PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*509WALKER, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of the 1967 rape of Mary Jo Welch Thaxton. According to defendant, this evidence should not have been admitted because it occurred some twenty-three (23) years before the alleged assault upon Angela Hatfield. Because of this lapse of time, defendant argues the prior act is so remote in time that any probative value is outweighed by the prejudicial effect.

In overruling defendant’s objection to the testimony of both Thaxton and Carla Wood, the trial court made detailed findings for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. YsaguireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. State v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. DemosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. HENGSTENBERGCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API