Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Thomas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Speed, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Oscar T. Brenton and Ralph W. Hopkins, on the first day of April, 1884, composed the firm of Brenton & Hopkins, which did a manufacturing business,, and was located at Wyandotte, in the county of Wayne.

On that day the firm was indebted to the plaintiff in the-sum of $5,000 and upwards, which indebtedness was incuned by his indoi’sements of the fixmx paper to obtain money to be-used by the firm in carrying on its business.

In carrying outlie business Brenton had the principal charge and management of the financial part of the business, and Hopkins took charge mostly of the mechanical and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. Snow, Foote & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Hoefliger v. WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Stecker v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. MaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Tate v. HollyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Tate v. HollyColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API