Legal Opinion

Tate v. Holly

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1912No. 3737Published

Appeal from Otero District Court. How. J. E. Rizer, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKiwg, J.

Judgment was obtained in the district court of the county of Otero against the defendants, jointly, as copartners, under the firm name and style of Tate and Smith, the firm consisting of Thomas Tate and L. B. Smith. From this judgment defendants prayed a joint appeal to the supreme court which was allowed on condition that within thirty days they “file bond in the sum of three thousand dollars.” Within the time specified, the defendants filed, their appeal bond, the portions of which deemed necessary for consideration, are as follows:

“Know All Men By These Presents, that we, Thomas Tate and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. MaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Creswell v. HerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Diamond Tunnel Gold & Silver Min. Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Burgan v. LyellMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Seekell v. FletcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API