Hoefliger v. Wells
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. Plaintiff appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylob, J.
The complaint alleges that at the time the indebtedness accrued, for the recovery of which this action was brought, one Michael Stafford and the defendant, Wells, were copartners, and did business as such at the city of Wausau, in this state, and that previous to the bringing of this action the said Stafford died, leaving the defendant his sole surviving partner.
The following are the material allegations as to the indebtedness:
“ That on or about the tenth day of April, 1873, at said city of Wausau, Wisconsin, the said Michael Stafford, as such co-partner, borrowed from the plaintiff, for and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Johnson v. WeedNew York Supreme Court · 1812
- Muldon v. WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Vail v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Schemerhorn v. LoinesNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Willson v. ForeeNew York Supreme Court · 1810
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnston Harvester Co v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Dille v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Mills v. RiggleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Smith v. Stock Yards Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Allis v. Meadow Spring Distilling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.