Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Tulsa County Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1948No. 33533PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff in error, Arthur Lewis, hereinafter referred to as protestant, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review denying his protest of a sinking fund levy.

On February 1, 1946, the board of education of the city of Tulsa issued its serial bonds of that date, in the aggregate amount of $4,500,000, and maturing in annual installments of $250,000 from February 1, 1949, to February 1, 1966. The bonds maturing in 1949 to and including 1952 ($1,000,000) bear interest at 3% per annum and the remainder at 1%.

The method provided to retire the Indebtedness was to levy a tax in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Perrine v. Bonaparte, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Andrews, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. McMahan v. Board of Ed., Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bailey, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opinion No. (1994), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API